MAYANJA’S REIGN OF TERROR! PM Nabbanja Petitioned to Punish Lands Minister for Ordering Illegal Lyantonde Land Eviction
The Prime Minister of Uganda, Robinah Nabbanja, has been urged to intervene in a land dispute involving the Minister of State for Lands, Sam Mayanja.
This follows Tuesday, June 24, 2025 incident, where Mayanja, accompanied by over 50 policemen, stormed Ranch No. 5A, Kabula Block, Kabula Ranching Scheme, Kakooma and directed a violent eviction of the late George Muhoozi family.
The eviction saw over 600 heads of cattle removed from the ranch land measuring 523.3000 hectares, with reports of locals stealing and slaughtering some of the animals.
The minister, who supervised this violent-unlawful-eviction up to 7pm, also ordered the arrest of one of the late Muhoozi family members-Stephen Owamazima.In a letter dated 25th June, 2025, SP Dennis Musinguzi, also a family member of the late Muhoozi, is urging the Prime Minister to rein in the errant minister.
According to Musinguzi, Mayanja’s actions on June 24, 2025, were unlawful and violated their constitutional rights.The incident has sparked widespread outrage, with many calling for the minister’s accountability.
Mayanja stands accused of ignoring advice from late Muhoozi family lawyers not to proceed with his actions.
“Our lawyers, Dentons Advocates (formerly Kyagaba & Otatiina Advocates), had on 23 June 2025 written to both the Hon. Attorney General and Hon. Dr. Mayanja warning that his proposed “locus in quo” visit scheduled for 24 June 2025 was irregular, unlawful, and contrary to the doctrine of collective Cabinet responsibility,” Musinguzi informs the PM and further castigates Mayanja contradicting earlier guidance by his senior colleague -the cabinet minister for lands, Judith Nabakooba, who advised maintaining the status quo and allowing the court process to run its course.
“This is because the Cabinet Minister of Lands, Hon, Judith Nabakooba, had already issued the official position of the Ministry in this matter. The visit also violated our constitutional right to a fair hearing.
Despite this, Hon. Dr. Mayanja proceeded with the visit and personally supervised and enforced a series of unlawful and criminal acts.”
According to Musinguzi, it was criminal and unlawful for Mayanja to veil his actions of the visit as to “sensitize the public on land rights,” when in actual sense it was a predetermined plan “to evict our family, including my mother, Mrs. Mable Muhoozi, and brother, Mr. Stephen Owamazima, from the land to the benefit of SSP Sarah Mwesigwa.”
“Not a single law and procedure in land evictions in Uganda was followed; he broke all the laws,” he stresses.
In the petition that has been copied to relevant authorities, including the Attorney General, Minister for Lands, Minister for Internal Affairs, and Minister for Defence and Veteran Affairs, Musinguzi says Mayanja indeed confirmed what was already known (to evict the late Muhoozi family) because when he reached on the ground, there was no attempt to inspect or verify facts on the ground across the 2 square miles in dispute but he instead, sat in tents arranged by SSP Sarah Mwesigwa, “in whose interest he was clearly acting.”
To cap it off, Mayanja, heavily guarded, oversaw property destruction, theft of cattle and as well causing arrests on top of threats to personally monitor the land each week, amidst continuous security deployment.
“Dr. Mayanja personally supervised the destruction of our homes and the forcible removal of hundreds of head of cattle, using earthmovers and escorted by armed UPDF, SFC, police, and private guards from Magnum Security. These animals were ferried to unknown locations. He oversaw the deployment of more than 50 armed persons to protect and enable illegal trenching and fencing by SSP Sarah Mwesigwa’s agents. As a result, our animals are now confined to a small area, at risk of death from starvation and overcrowding. My brother, Mr. Stephen Owamazima, who had been invited to attend the meeting, was arrested and detained without justification,” the petition further reads.
APPEAL
The late Muhoozi family is requesting the Prime Minister to immediately stop any further interference on the land by Mayanja, order an independent investigation into the matter, and to direct the responsible institutions to restore possession and property.
The Prime Minister’s office has been contacted for a comment.
WIDER PICTURE
The 523 hectares suit land comprised in Leasehold Register Volume MSK 340 Folio 18 Plot 5A Ranch 5A is being contested between the beneficiaries of the estate of late Mzee George Muhoozi who are Stephen Owamazima, Mable Muhoozi and Dennis Musinguzi Vs SSP Sarah Mwesigwa, Thabani Muhamond Amin and Fourways Investment Limited.
The late Mzee George Muhoozi family assert occupation of the land for over 40 years (since the early 1980s), purportedly with the consent of a prior owner, Roy Sebastian Katongole Zavuga.
Ironically, they now feel minister Mayanja has been influenced (by power, fame and money) to act against the law which protects them from eviction.
In Uganda, the 1995 Constitution and the Land Act (Cap 236) recognize and protect the rights of lawful and bona fide occupants on registered land, including mailo, freehold, and leasehold tenures.
In this case, the late Muhoozi family claims to have been on the property since the 1980s grazing their cattle while enjoying the status of bonafide occupants. A one Thabani Muhamond Amin is said to have obtained the certificate of title of the same land in 2017. He later transferred the land to Fourways Investment Limited.
This means at the time of issuance of the said land title, the late Muhoozi family was in occupation of the same.
This implies that both parties have interest in the land and the matter is already before Masaka High Court vide Civil suit No. 06 of 2025 (Stephen Owamazima Dennis Musinguzi and Mable Muhoozi Vs Sarah Mwesigwa, Fourways Limited and Muhamond Thabani as defendants) which is pending determination before Her Worship Loe Karungi.
The defendants countersued, seeking to evict the late Muhoozi family. They as well applied for a temporary injunction which succeeded but the judge did not issue an eviction order.
Nevertheless, the late Muhoozi family through their lawyers of Dentons (Kyagaba & Otatiina Advocates) and Kiyonga-B-Asasira & Co. Advocates appealed the temporary injunction and went on to maintain the status quo on ground until the court process is concluded.
This is the same view that was held by senior lands and housing minister, Judith Nabakooba. In a letter dated 2nd April, 2025 and addressed to the Inspector General of Police amidst eviction threats against the late Muhoozi family, she advised that the matter being in court, the status quo be maintained and that parties should allow the court process to run its course.
In a twist of events, the defendants (SSP Sarah Mwesigwa, Fourways Limited and Muhamond Thabani Amin) interpreted the temporary injunction ruling as an eviction order.
To them, the late Muhoozi family was supposed to vacate the land immediately. They went on to file an application seeking to hold the former in contempt of court vide M.A 183 of 2025 and hearing is scheduled 3rd of July 2025.
RUNS TO MINISTER MAYANJA
Curiously, the same defendants, instead of waiting for court to convene and deliberate on the late Muhoozi family appeal and contempt of court applications on 3rd July, they instead ran to minister Mayanja alleging that the late Muhoozi family is in contempt of a court order.
Mayanja, without summoning both parties to listen to them before making an informed decision, he hit the ground running.
“The Minister listened only to the defendants (Sarah Mwesigwa, Fourways Limited and Muhamond Thabani Amin) and that was all. He never bothered to invite the late Muhoozi family members, nor their lawyers. That tells you where his interests are!” A family member of the late Muhoozi observes.
Indeed on 20th June, Mayanja informed the Lyantonde RDC that he would conduct a ‘locus in quo’ visit on the suit land on Tuesday, 24 of June 2025 at 12:00 noon.
“I will also sensitize the wanainchi on their land rights as set out in the constitution, Land Act and Presidential Directives. You are accordingly directed to make appropriate arrangements to make this visit a success. Mobilize widely,” the minister informed Lyantonde RDC.
The visit was protested by the late Muhoozi family through their lawyers of Dentons (Kyagaba & Otatiina Advocates) and Kiyonga-B-Asasira & Co. Advocates citing concerns over judicial independence, natural justice, and collective responsibility.
The visit was also viewed as executive interference with the independence of the judiciary. The lawyers argued that the visit would prejudice ongoing court proceedings in Masaka High Court Civil Suit No. 6 of 2025, which involves the late Muhoozi family and SSP Sarah Mwesigwa, among others. They contended that the court has exclusive jurisdiction to visit the locus in quo under Order 18 Rule 14 of the Civil Procedure Rules.
“Given the pending proceedings, any administrative or quasi-judicial action touching the merits or character of the land dispute such as the proposed visit risks prejudicing or undermining the authority of the Court. Moreover, as the matter is before a competent court, the power to visit the locus in quo lies exclusively with the Court under Order 18 Rule 14 of the Civil Procedure Rules. Any parallel visit could be interpreted as an Intrusion into the judicial process,” the lawyers argued.
The visit also raised concerns over bias and natural justice, noting that the late Muhoozi family was not served with a copy of the petition by SSP Sarah that prompted the minister’s intended action and was not offered an opportunity to respond. This, they argued, offended the principle of audi alteram partem and contravened Article 42 of the constitution.
“This conduct gives rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias, which further undermines the legitimacy and fairness of the proposed visit. As a Minister of State, it is incumbent that you act impartially and to avoid actions that cast doubt on that neutrality,” the lawyers opined.
Furthermore, the lawyers pointed out that the minister’s actions contradicted earlier guidance by his senior colleague -the cabinet minister for lands, Judith Nabakooba, who advised maintaining the status quo and allowing the court process to run its course.
They also cited a recent judicial precedent, Misc. Cause No. 1 of 2025, where the High Court found a similar ministerial conduct by Mayanja unlawful.
“Under the principles of collective responsibility as enshrined in Articles 113, 114, and 117 of the Constitution, we respectfully submit that it is inappropriate for a Minister of State to contradict or reopen a matter already addressed by the substantive Cabinet Minister. We finally refer to the recent ruling in Misc. Cause No. 1 of 2025 – Kanaba Estates & Agencies Ltd v Hon. Sam Mayanja & Attorney General, where the High Court at Kiboga found the Hon Minister’s conduct unlawful and issued Judicial Review remedies for interference with a matter that was properly before court. This precedent further supports the position that the intended visit under similar factual circumstances would be legally impermissible and likely to attract similar legal consequences,” the lawyers pointed out.
Despite this advice, on Tuesday, June 24, 2025, Minister Mayanja, accompanied by over 50 policemen, stormed the disputed land and directed a violent eviction of the Muhoozi family.
SSP SARAH INTERESTS ON THE LAND QUESTIONED
The involvement of SSP Sarah Mwesigwa in this land saga has remained a mystery. Unconfirmed reports indicate that she is just a mere land broker always targeting land with questionable ownership.
Our investigations show that SSP Sarah Mwesigwa has no proprietary interest in the disputed land. A quick search at the ministry of lands shows Four Ways Investments Ltd as the registered proprietor of the suit land, in which SSP Mwesigwa holds no shareholder or directorial position.
“Our clients have occupied continuously since the 1980s and are therefore lawful occupants,” the late Muhoozi family’s lawyers stress.
Unconfirmed reports allege that other authorities like military generals are also applying pressure on the judiciary and local administrative authorities to influence them in favour of SSP Sarah Mwesigwa, Fourways Limited and Muhamond Thabani Amin.
Mayanja’s action raises questions about the Minister’s commitment to upholding the principles of natural justice and procedural fairness in his decision-making process.
About Post Author
